Appeal Rejected as Time-Barred Due to Filing Delay The appeal was rejected by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata as time-barred due to a delay in filing. The Commissioner's order was dispatched on ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Appeal Rejected as Time-Barred Due to Filing Delay
The appeal was rejected by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata as time-barred due to a delay in filing. The Commissioner's order was dispatched on 13-5-2003, but no postal endorsement was present when the appellant collected it on 7-7-2003.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata rejected the appeal as time-barred due to a delay of more than two months in filing, which was not satisfactorily explained. The order of the Commissioner (Appeals) was despatched to the appellant on 13-5-2003 by Registered AD, but there was no endorsement from the Postal Authorities on the envelope when the appellant collected it on 7-7-2003.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.