Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit on furnace oil used as fuel in the manufacture of exempt final products was admissible, and whether the assessee could avoid reversal on the ground that the fuel was not contained in the final product.
Analysis: The credit scheme under Rule 57A permitted credit on inputs, but the exclusion under Rule 57C(2) was held not to govern fuel inputs because sub-rule (3) carved out such inputs from the operation of sub-rule (2). Even so, the decisive point was that where the final product was wholly exempt, the basic conditions for admissibility of credit were not satisfied. On that footing, the credit taken on furnace oil used in the manufacture of exempt tyres was treated as not legally available from the outset, and the question of reversal under Rule 57CC did not arise. The penalty was also upheld on the basis that the credit had been wrongly availed.
Conclusion: Modvat credit on furnace oil used as fuel for manufacture of exempt final products was held inadmissible, and the demand and penalty were sustained against the assessee.