Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on the basis of the importer's certificate and photocopy of the bill of entry when the goods and the duty paid thereon were not co-relatable to the credit claimed.
Analysis: The credit was claimed on a part quantity of imported Muriate of Potash, but the record showed that the quantity covered by the bill of entry and the invoice did not match the quantity on which credit was taken. The documents relied upon were not among the recognised documents under Rule 57G of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, and there was no allegation or proof that duty had been paid on the quantity for which credit was claimed. Where the claimed credit is not traceable to duty-paid imports, Modvat benefit cannot be granted.
Conclusion: The credit was rightly denied and the appeal failed.