TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>CESTAT rules no duty on re-processed goods, appellant gets refund, department's appeal dismissed</h1> <h3>COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, SURAT-I Versus AMTREX HITACHI APPLIANCES LIMITED</h3> COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, SURAT-I Versus AMTREX HITACHI APPLIANCES LIMITED - 2004 (174) E.L.T. 496 (Tri. - Mumbai) The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that they were not required to pay duty on re-processed goods initially. The appellant paid duty twice but later sought a refund within the prescribed period, so the appeal by the department was dismissed.
TaxTMI 