Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the goods described as horn controller were prima facie classifiable under Heading 87.08 rather than Heading 85.12, and whether waiver of pre-deposit with stay of recovery was warranted.
Analysis: The dispute concerned tariff classification of horn controller for duty demand purposes. On a comparison of the rival tariff entries, the Tribunal formed a prima facie view that the assessee's classification under Heading 87.08 appeared correct. That prima facie assessment was sufficient for considering interim relief in the pending appeals.
Conclusion: Waiver of pre-deposit was granted and recovery of the duty demand was stayed.