Company's Appeal Dismissed for Incorrect Jurisdiction by CESTAT Mumbai The appeal of a company was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai due to incorrect jurisdiction. The Commissioner of Central Excise ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Company's Appeal Dismissed for Incorrect Jurisdiction by CESTAT Mumbai
The appeal of a company was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai due to incorrect jurisdiction. The Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Mumbai-II had dismissed the appeal filed in the wrong jurisdiction, and the Tribunal could not issue a new order as the correct jurisdiction was with CCE (Appeals), Bombay-V.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai dismissed the appeal of a company due to incorrect jurisdiction. The Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Mumbai-II had dismissed the appeal filed in the wrong jurisdiction. The Tribunal could not direct a new order as the correct jurisdiction was with CCE (Appeals), Bombay-V. The appeal was dismissed.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.