Final order on fresh lease deed cannot be resisted once accepted and left unchallenged.

A party that accepts and does not challenge a final order directing execution of a fresh lease deed on specified terms cannot later resist consequential directions implementing that order. The earlier order had fixed the commercial terms of the renewed lease, and that position had attained finality. Once the underlying arrangement was accepted, compliance with amendments consistent with the existing lease became mandatory. The dispute over third- and fourth-party rights and regulatory restrictions had also been resolved, so the Commission's directions were confined to securing execution of the fresh lease deed and handover of possession in line with the settled position.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Commission was justified in directing execution of a fresh lease deed with amendments consistent with the earlier lease and in requiring handover of possession after the appellants had accepted the earlier order and the regulatory dispute had been resolved.

Analysis: The appeal arose from directions requiring the appellants to execute a fresh lease deed and incorporate specified clauses substantially aligned with the earlier lease arrangement. The earlier order of the Commission, by which the appellants had agreed that the commercial terms in the original lease deed would remain unchanged in the new lease, had not been challenged and had attained finality. Once that position stood accepted, the appellants could not resist compliance with the consequential directions flowing from it. The Court also noted that the dispute about third and fourth party rights and regulatory restrictions had already been resolved, and the Commission's directions were confined to securing execution of the fresh lease on terms consistent with the earlier agreement and the settled regulatory position.

Conclusion: The Commission's directions were upheld and the appeal failed.

Ratio Decidendi: A party that accepts and does not challenge a final order directing execution of a fresh contractual instrument on specified terms cannot later resist compliance with consequential directions implementing that final order.

---