https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111851 A party that accepts and does not challenge a final order directing execution of a fresh lease deed on specified terms cannot later resist consequential directions implementing that order. The earlier order had fixed the commercial terms of the renewed lease, and that position had attained finality. Once the underlying arrangement was accepted, compliance with amendments consistent with the existing lease became mandatory. The dispute over third- and fourth-party rights and regulatory restrictions had also been resolved, so the Commission's directions were confined to securing execution of the fresh lease deed and handover of possession in line with the settled position. en-us Fri, 16 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Aug 2013 10:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111851 A party that accepts and does not challenge a final order directing execution of a fresh lease deed on specified terms cannot later resist consequential directions implementing that order. The earlier order had fixed the commercial terms of the renewed lease, and that position had attained finality. Once the underlying arrangement was accepted, compliance with amendments consistent with the existing lease became mandatory. The dispute over third- and fourth-party rights and regulatory restrictions had also been resolved, so the Commission's directions were confined to securing execution of the fresh lease deed and handover of possession in line with the settled position. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 16 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111851