Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on goods claimed to be parts or components of capital goods when the principal goods themselves were excluded from the definition of capital goods under Rule 57Q.
Analysis: The disputed articles were classified under Heading 90.33 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and therefore stood outside the definition of capital goods under the table appended to Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. Clause 5 of the table permitted credit for parts and components only when they related to capital goods that were otherwise eligible under Clauses 1 to 4. Parts or components of goods already excluded from the definition could not be brought within the rule by invoking Clause 5.
Conclusion: The Modvat credit was not admissible and the disallowance was upheld in favour of the Revenue.
Final Conclusion: Credit under Rule 57Q could not be claimed on parts or components of goods that were themselves ineligible as capital goods, and the appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Parts and components qualify for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q only when they relate to capital goods that are themselves covered by the rule.