Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported self-adhesive reflective film was classifiable under Customs Tariff Heading 3919.90 or under the residuary Customs Tariff Heading 3926.90, and whether it could be cleared under OGL.
Analysis: The imported goods were self-adhesive plastic film in jumbo rolls with metallic pieces embedded to provide reflectivity. Heading 39.19 covered self-adhesive plates, sheets, film, foil, tape, strip and other flat shapes of plastics, while Heading 39.26 was a residuary entry for other articles of plastic not elsewhere specified. Classification had to be determined on the basis of the goods as presented for assessment, not on the basis of their intended end-use after processing in the importer's factory. On that test, the goods were plainly self-adhesive plastic films and did not fall within the residuary heading. The contrary finding was unsupported by material such as a test report.
Conclusion: The goods were classifiable under Customs Tariff Heading 3919.90 and were eligible for clearance under OGL; the contrary classification under Heading 3926.90 was rejected.
Final Conclusion: The classification adopted by the departmental authorities was set aside and the importer succeeded on merits.
Ratio Decidendi: Imported goods must be classified according to their character and description at the time of presentation for assessment, and a residuary heading cannot be applied where a specific heading squarely covers the goods.