Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty on the question whether Sub-heading 8539.10 applied to auto bulbs sold in bulk.
Analysis: The disputed goods were auto bulbs falling under Sub-heading 8539. The demand was based only on the ground that the goods were sold in bulk and not in retail, and that retail price was not affixed on each bulb. The retail sale price declared for the bulbs was not shown to exceed Rs. 20 per bulb. The relevant entry required only that the retail sale price should not exceed that limit. The circular relied upon also supported the view that bulk quantities and retail-price based quantities required separate treatment for valuation purposes.
Conclusion: The appellants had a strong prima facie case, and pre-deposit of duty and penalty was waived in full with stay granted.
Ratio Decidendi: For the purpose of interim relief, classification under the relevant tariff entry turns on whether the retail sale price exceeds the prescribed limit, and not merely on whether the goods were sold in bulk.