Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Shaheen Misri and Kokan Misri, prepared from tobacco dust by heating, roasting, grinding and adding salt, were classifiable under Tariff Entry 2404.90 as manufactured tobacco or under Tariff Entry 2401.90 as unmanufactured tobacco.
Analysis: The product was subjected to processing that altered the raw tobacco dust before sale, including removal of moisture, addition of salt, roasting and grinding. Tariff Entry 24.04 covers other manufactured tobacco and tobacco preparations, and the reasoning adopted treated cut tobacco and similar processed tobacco products as falling within that entry. On that basis, tobacco dust used in the preparation did not prevent the finished product from being regarded as manufactured tobacco. The same view had also been taken in comparable appellate orders.
Conclusion: The product was correctly classifiable under Tariff Entry 2404.90 and not under Tariff Entry 2401.90; the Revenue's appeal failed.
Final Conclusion: The classification adopted by the lower appellate authority was upheld, with the result that the appeal was rejected and the assessee's classification prevailed.
Ratio Decidendi: A tobacco product subjected to substantial processing that results in a manufactured tobacco preparation falls under the tariff entry for manufactured tobacco rather than the entry for unmanufactured tobacco.