Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the clearances of the respondent-unit and the job-worker could be clubbed for computing the exemption limit under Notification No. 175/86-CE on the basis that the job-worker was a dummy unit or otherwise under the respondent's control.
Analysis: The Tribunal found that the record contained no material to show that the respondent exercised full control over the job-worker so as to justify clubbing of clearances. There was no evidence of mutuality of interest, nor any financial flow back between the two units. The units were treated as distinct entities, and the department failed to establish that the transactions were not at arm's length.
Conclusion: The clearances could not be clubbed, and the Revenue's appeal failed.