Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the drier cooler was covered by Notification No. 51/93-C.E. as goods falling under Chapter Heading 84.19 for treatment of materials by condensing or cooling.
Analysis: The item was examined with reference to Chapter Heading 84.19, which covers goods used for the treatment of materials by condensing or cooling. On the facts noted, the equipment was found to reduce the temperature of soya seeds and not to undertake any qualifying treatment of materials by condensing or cooling within the scope of the notification. The Commissioner (Appeals) had therefore correctly extended the benefit of the notification.
Conclusion: The drier cooler was not excluded from the benefit claimed, and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order granting the notification benefit was sustained and the Revenue's appeal was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: An exemption notification covering machinery for treatment of materials by condensing or cooling cannot be denied where the equipment, on the facts found, does not fall outside the notified description.