Appeal rejected on swimming goggles classification dispute. Penalty reduced. The appeal was rejected by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai, in a dispute over the classification of swimming goggles under Chapter 95 or Chapter 90. ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Appeal rejected on swimming goggles classification dispute. Penalty reduced.
The appeal was rejected by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai, in a dispute over the classification of swimming goggles under Chapter 95 or Chapter 90. The penalty was reduced from Rs. 15,000 to Rs. 1,000 in the impugned order-in-appeal, pronounced on 27-11-2002.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai heard a dispute regarding the classification of swimming goggles under Chapter 95 or Chapter 90. The impugned order-in-appeal reduced the penalty from Rs. 15,000 to Rs. 1,000. The appeal was rejected, and the order was pronounced on 27-11-2002.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.