TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeal rejected on swimming goggles classification dispute. Penalty reduced.</h1> <h3>ASHOKA GAMES Versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, MUMBAI</h3> ASHOKA GAMES Versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, MUMBAI - 2004 (163) E.L.T. 340 (Tri. - Mumbai) The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai heard a dispute regarding the classification of swimming goggles under Chapter 95 or Chapter 90. The impugned order-in-appeal reduced the penalty from Rs. 15,000 to Rs. 1,000. The appeal was rejected, and the order was pronounced on 27-11-2002.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
