CESTAT: Goods classified as household articles of plastic, not furniture. Appeal allowed with consequential benefit. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai ruled in favor of the appellants regarding the classification of goods as household articles of plastic under ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
CESTAT: Goods classified as household articles of plastic, not furniture. Appeal allowed with consequential benefit.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai ruled in favor of the appellants regarding the classification of goods as household articles of plastic under sub-heading 3924.90, instead of furniture under sub-heading 9403.00. The appeal was allowed with consequential benefit to the appellants on 28-11-2002.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai ruled in favor of the appellants regarding the classification of goods as household articles of plastic under sub-heading 3924.90, instead of furniture under sub-heading 9403.00. The appeal was allowed with consequential benefit to the appellants on 28-11-2002.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.