Withdrawn tariff value cannot govern valuation; procedural non-filing of price declaration does not by itself prove undervaluation.

A withdrawn tariff value could not be treated as a continuing benchmark for excise valuation, so duty demand could not be sustained merely because the goods were cleared below an earlier notified price. Short levy had to be proved by showing that the assessable value was contrary to the statutory valuation provisions, and the mere absence of a price declaration was only a procedural lapse that did not by itself establish undervaluation. Earlier higher selling prices also did not prevent later lower market-based sales. On that reasoning, the duty demand and penalty were held unsustainable and the assessee succeeded.

---

---

Issues: Whether duty demand and penalty could be sustained on the basis that the goods were cleared at prices lower than the earlier tariff value and that no price declaration was filed, despite the tariff value having been withdrawn and the assessable value otherwise being adopted under the valuation provisions.

Analysis: The tariff value notified for the goods had been withdrawn before the clearances in dispute, and it could not be treated as a continuing benchmark for later assessment. Under the valuation scheme, short levy had to be established by showing that the value adopted for duty was not in accordance with the statutory valuation provisions. The absence of a formal price declaration, even if assumed, was at best a procedural lapse under the relevant rule and did not by itself prove undervaluation. Earlier higher selling prices did not preclude later sales at lower prices, since commodity prices fluctuate according to market conditions.

Conclusion: The demand for duty and the penalty were not sustainable. The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

Ratio Decidendi: A withdrawn tariff value cannot be used as a perpetual standard for valuation, and a procedural failure to file price declaration does not by itself establish undervaluation or short levy under the excise valuation provisions.

---