Service Tax Refund Ordered for Unauthorized Collection on Installation Activities The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai held that Service Tax collected before May 13, 2004, for commissioning and installation activities is unauthorized. ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Service Tax Refund Ordered for Unauthorized Collection on Installation Activities
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai held that Service Tax collected before May 13, 2004, for commissioning and installation activities is unauthorized. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's appeal and ordered the refund of the amount to the respondent instead of crediting it to the Consumer Welfare Fund.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai ruled that Service Tax collected before May 13, 2004, for commissioning and installation activities is unauthorized. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal by the Revenue and upheld the decision to refund the amount to the respondent, not credit it to the Consumer Welfare Fund. (Citation: 2006 (11) TMI 40 - CESTAT, Mumbai)
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.