Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Companies Law

        2004 (5) TMI 314 - HC - Companies Law

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Approval of Amalgamation Scheme under Companies Act enhances operational efficiencies and shareholder value The Court approved the Scheme of Amalgamation involving five Transferor-Companies with a Transferee-Company under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies ...
                          Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                              Approval of Amalgamation Scheme under Companies Act enhances operational efficiencies and shareholder value

                              The Court approved the Scheme of Amalgamation involving five Transferor-Companies with a Transferee-Company under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act. The Scheme aimed to enhance operational efficiencies, strengthen market position, and maximize shareholder value. The Court found the Scheme fair, reasonable, and in the interest of shareholders and the public. With unanimous approval from shareholders and creditors, the Court sanctioned the Scheme, emphasizing the limited scope of judicial review and directing compliance with legal formalities. Each party was ordered to pay costs to designated entities within a specified timeframe.




                              Issues Involved:
                              1. Invocation of sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act for sanctioning a Scheme of Amalgamation.
                              2. Details and business activities of the Transferor-Companies and Transferee-Company.
                              3. Salient features and objectives of the Scheme of Amalgamation.
                              4. Financial structure and share capital of the involved companies.
                              5. Legal formalities and compliance for the Scheme's approval.
                              6. Judicial review and approval of the Scheme.

                              Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                              1. Invocation of sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act for sanctioning a Scheme of Amalgamation:
                              The petition was filed by De Beers India Minerals Pvt. Ltd. (DBIMPL) to invoke sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act to obtain sanction for the Scheme of Amalgamation involving five Transferor-Companies (DBIMPL, DBIEPL, DBIGPL, DBISPL, and DBIPPL) with De Beers India Private Ltd. (DBIPL/Transferee Company).

                              2. Details and business activities of the Transferor-Companies and Transferee-Company:
                              - DBIMPL (Transferor-Company No. 1): Incorporated on 30-5-1997, engaged in prospecting and exploration of diamonds, precious stones, and other minerals.
                              - DBIEPL (Transferor-Company No. 2): Incorporated on 30-10-1998, intended for prospecting, exploring, mining, and quarrying but had not commenced activities as of the Appointed Date.
                              - DBIGPL (Transferor-Company No. 3): Incorporated on 15-11-1994, engaged in the business of prospecting and exploration of diamonds and precious stones.
                              - DBISPL (Transferor-Company No. 4): Incorporated on 15-11-1994, engaged in reconnaissance activities and established a treatment plant in Bangalore.
                              - DBIPPL (Transferor-Company No. 5): Incorporated on 16-6-1994, engaged in reconnaissance activities and established a treatment plant in Bangalore.
                              - DBIPL (Transferee-Company): Incorporated on 15-11-1994, providing services of geologists and other qualified technicians, as well as mining-related and corporate services.

                              3. Salient features and objectives of the Scheme of Amalgamation:
                              The Scheme involves the transfer and vesting of all assets, properties, debts, liabilities, and obligations of the Transferor-Companies to the Transferee-Company without further acts or consent of third parties. The Scheme aims to:
                              - Achieve efficient utilization of capital and create a stronger base for future growth.
                              - Result in administrative and operational rationalization, organizational efficiencies, and reduction in overhead and other expenses.
                              - Strengthen the Transferee-Company's position in the competitive market and enhance shareholder value.

                              4. Financial structure and share capital of the involved companies:
                              - DBIMPL: Authorized capital of Rs. 50,000,000, issued, subscribed, and paid-up capital of Rs. 31,815,000.
                              - DBIEPL: Authorized capital of Rs. 2,500,000, issued, subscribed, and paid-up capital of Rs. 1,41,430.
                              - DBIGPL: Authorized capital of Rs. 5,000,000, issued, subscribed, and paid-up capital of Rs. 3,049,210.
                              - DBISPL: Authorized capital of Rs. 140,000,000, issued, subscribed, and paid-up capital of Rs. 124,754,730.
                              - DBIPPL: Authorized capital of Rs. 80,000,000, issued, subscribed, and paid-up capital of Rs. 68,417,830.
                              - DBIPL: Authorized capital of Rs. 23,000,000, issued, subscribed, and paid-up capital of Rs. 19,441,350.

                              5. Legal formalities and compliance for the Scheme's approval:
                              The Scheme is conditional on:
                              - Approval by the requisite majority of the respective members.
                              - Sanctions and orders under sections 391 and 394 of the Act.
                              - Approval from the Government of India and/or Reserve Bank of India under the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999.
                              The Scheme becomes effective upon obtaining all necessary consents, approvals, permissions, resolutions, and orders.

                              6. Judicial review and approval of the Scheme:
                              The Court reviewed the Scheme, noting that it is sound, fair, reasonable, and not prejudicial to the interest of shareholders or public interest. The Scheme was unanimously approved by the respective shareholders and creditors, and no objections were raised. The Court allowed the petition in terms of the prayer clauses (a) to (h), with liberty to proceed in accordance with the law. The costs of Rs. 2,500 each were to be paid to the Regional Director and the Official Liquidator within four weeks.

                              The judgment emphasized the limited scope of judicial review in such matters, focusing on whether the Scheme is unfair, unreasonable, contrary to law, or public policy. As all necessary formalities and legal compliances were met, the Scheme was sanctioned.
                              Full Summary is available for active users!
                              Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                              Topics

                              ActsIncome Tax
                              No Records Found