Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit could be denied on Centre Column and Bottom Plates used as part of moulds, when moulds and dies were recognised as capital goods under the applicable excise/CENVAT regime.
Analysis: The relevant scheme treated moulds and dies as eligible items both before and after the CENVAT Rules, 2001, and there was no material change in the legal position affecting their treatment. On the facts found, the Centre Column and Bottom Plates formed part and parcel of the moulds. Since the articles were integral to the moulds and the law did not undergo any change that would justify a different treatment, credit could not be denied merely on that basis.
Conclusion: Modvat credit on the Centre Column and Bottom Plates was admissible, and the denial of credit was unsustainable.