Arbitration Act petitions cannot seek declaration that no concluded contract exists; such relief belongs in a civil suit.

Petitions under sections 32 and 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 cannot be used to obtain a declaration that no concluded contract exists or that the underlying contract is void. The provisions are of limited scope and do not extend to a challenge directed in substance at the existence and enforceability of the contract itself. Such relief lies in a civil suit within the ordinary jurisdiction of the civil court under section 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The article therefore explains that a petition framed as an attack on an arbitration agreement may still fail if it is in substance a dispute about the underlying contract.

---

---

Issues: Whether petitions under section 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 were maintainable for seeking a declaration that no valid and binding contract or arbitration agreement had come into existence between the parties.

Analysis: The relief claimed, though framed as a challenge to the existence or validity of an arbitration agreement, was in substance a challenge to the existence and enforceability of the underlying contract itself. Sections 32 and 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 are of limited application and are not intended to cover a suit or petition seeking a declaration that no contract was concluded or that the contract is void. Such relief lies in a civil suit within the ordinary jurisdiction of the civil court under section 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. On that reasoning, the petitions could not be entertained under section 33.

Conclusion: The petitions under section 33 were not maintainable and the petitioner was not entitled to the declaration sought.

Final Conclusion: The challenge failed because the forum chosen was inappropriate for obtaining a declaration on the existence or validity of the underlying contract, and the petitions were dismissed.

Ratio Decidendi: A petition under sections 32 and 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 cannot be used to obtain a declaration that no concluded contract exists or that the underlying contract is void; such relief must be pursued in a civil suit.

---