Consent-based property custody directions upheld as lease proceeds were segregated and title was left open for separate challenge.

The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition, noting that the impugned directions on custody of the property and lease arrangements were founded on consent. The petitioner's interest was safeguarded by segregation of the lease proceeds, and the petitioner's title was expressly left open to be pursued in separate proceedings.

---

---

Outcome: Special leave petition dismissed. The impugned directions regarding custody of the property and lease arrangements were based on consent, the petitioner's interest was protected by segregation of lease proceeds, and the petitioner's title was expressly left open to be agitated in separate proceedings.

---