CEGAT Mumbai remands appeal without pre-deposit due to Section 35F non-compliance The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai allowed the appeal, remanding the matter back to the appellate authority without requiring pre-deposit. The initial ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
CEGAT Mumbai remands appeal without pre-deposit due to Section 35F non-compliance
The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai allowed the appeal, remanding the matter back to the appellate authority without requiring pre-deposit. The initial dismissal of the appeal was due to non-compliance with Section 35F of the Central Excise Act concerning Modvat denial linked to a correctable defect in the invoice from a First Stage Dealer.
The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai allowed the appeal and remanded the matter back to the appellate authority for hearing without insisting on pre-deposit. The appeal was dismissed initially due to non-compliance with Section 35F of the Central Excise Act regarding Modvat denial based on a curable defect in the invoice from a First Stage Dealer.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.