Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether waiver of pre-deposit of penalty was justified and whether recovery of the penalty amount should be stayed in view of the Board circular permitting non-entry in RG-23D where modvatable invoices were not intended to be issued.
Analysis: The circular relied upon recognised that a registered dealer need not enter particulars in RG-23D for consignments received under Rule 52A or Rule 57G invoices if modvatable invoices were not proposed to be issued. On that basis, the applicant established a strong prima facie case against imposition and recovery of the penalty at the interim stage.
Conclusion: Recovery of the entire penalty was stayed and the requirement of pre-deposit was waived for the time being.