Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the cam forming part of a capsule making machine was classifiable under Heading 84.83 as transmission shafts or under Heading 84.79 as part of the machine.
Analysis: Heading 84.79 covers machines and mechanical appliances having individual functions not specified or included elsewhere in Chapter 84, while Heading 84.83 covers transmission shafts, including camshafts and crankshafts. The cam in question was used in the process of transmitting motion and converting rotary motion into reciprocal motion, but that functional use did not make it a transmission shaft. Classification under Heading 84.83 required the goods to answer the description of a transmission shaft or camshaft, and the cam was not shown to be synonymous with a shaft. Since the department could not establish a basis for the assigned classification, the appellant's claimed classification had to be accepted.
Conclusion: The cam was not classifiable under Heading 84.83 and the appellant's classification was accepted.
Final Conclusion: The impugned classification was set aside and the appeal succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: A component cannot be classified under a tariff heading merely because it performs a motion-transmitting function unless it specifically answers the description used in that heading.