Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the goods were liable to confiscation and penalty for alleged non-entry in the statutory records, and whether the entry was required only at the close of the day of manufacture under Rule 53 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: The material on record did not establish liability for confiscation or penalty. The goods were found to have been manufactured late in the night and early morning, and the finding recorded that they were required to be entered in the statutory records only on 8-5-1992 at the close of the day. Since inspection was also conducted on the same day, the omission could not be treated as non-accountal. There was also no material indicating clandestine removal.
Conclusion: The goods were not liable to confiscation or penalty, and the Revenue had no ground to interfere with the order of the appellate authority.