Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a manufacturer availing exemption under Notification 16/97 was barred from taking Modvat credit on inputs used in the manufacture of exported goods and, consequently, from claiming refund under Rule 57F(13) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: The exemption condition in clause (iii) of paragraph 2 of Notification 16/97 prohibited availing Modvat credit only in respect of inputs used in the manufacture of specified goods cleared for home consumption. It did not extend to inputs used in the manufacture of exported products. Since the refund claim related to unutilised credit attributable to exported goods, the condition in the notification did not disentitle the assessee from Modvat credit or refund under Rule 57F(13).
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to the refund, and the denial of credit was unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: An exemption condition restricting Modvat credit for goods cleared for home consumption does not, by itself, prohibit credit or refund in respect of inputs used for exported goods.