Tariff classification turns on the goods' essential features, not the buyer or end use, for heater core classification.

Tariff classification depends on the essential features of the goods, not on the identity of the buyer or intended end use, where those features do not satisfy the heading description. A heater core manufactured without a motor-driven fan and without elements for changing both temperature and humidity did not fall within Heading 8415.00 for air-conditioning machines. On the facts found, the goods were correctly classifiable under Heading 8419.90 as parts of heat exchangers, and the lower authority's classification could not be sustained.

---

---

Issues: Whether the heater core manufactured by the appellant was classifiable under Heading 8415.00 or under Heading 8419.90 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.

Analysis: Heading 8415.00 covers air-conditioning machines comprising a motor-driven fan and elements for changing temperature and humidity. The goods in question were a heater core only, without a fan and without elements for changing both temperature and humidity. Classification under Heading 8415.00 was therefore not available. The fact that the goods were supplied to manufacturers of automobile air-conditioners did not determine the classification. The alternative heading, covering parts of heat exchangers, was the appropriate one on the facts found.

Conclusion: The goods were not classifiable under Heading 8415.00 and were correctly classifiable under Heading 8419.90, in favour of the appellant.

Final Conclusion: The classification adopted by the lower authority could not be sustained, and the assessee succeeded in the appeals.

Ratio Decidendi: For tariff classification, the scope of the relevant heading must be determined by the essential features of the goods themselves, and not by the identity of the buyer or the intended end use, where those features do not satisfy the heading description.

---