Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether deemed Modvat credit under Notification No. 58/97-Central Excise dated 30-08-1997 could be denied merely because the supplier had not deposited interest on delayed payment of central excise duty, although the duty on the inputs had been paid under Section 3A of the Central Excise Act.
Analysis: The notification extended deemed duty credit to specified inputs received under cover of an invoice declaring payment of appropriate excise duty under Section 3A. The condition for eligibility concerned payment of duty on the inputs. The record showed that the appropriate duty had been paid and certified by the Range Officer. The only default was non-payment of interest for delayed payment of duty by the supplier, which was not a condition specified in the notification for denying credit.
Conclusion: The benefit of the notification could not be denied on account of non-deposit of interest when the duty itself had been paid. The denial of deemed Modvat credit was unsustainable and the appeal was allowed.