Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the State advised price paid by sugar factories for sugarcane forms part of the purchase price liable to purchase tax under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957.
Analysis: The statutory scheme treated the minimum price fixed under the Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966 as only the floor price. The Court held that where the buyer in fact pays a higher State advised price, that amount represents the real consideration for the purchase and cannot be excluded from the purchase price merely because it is fixed under a State advisory mechanism or because later adjustments may be contemplated. The liability to purchase tax depends on the actual purchase price paid for the transaction, not on a narrower contractual characterisation adopted by the assessee. The Court further held that the view taken in the earlier cases supported inclusion of the State advised price where it is the amount actually paid for procurement of sugarcane.
Conclusion: The State advised price paid for sugarcane is includible in the purchase price and is liable to purchase tax; the assessee's challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: For purchase tax purposes, the relevant amount is the actual consideration paid for the purchase of sugarcane, and a State advised price paid above the minimum price fixed under the Control Order forms part of that purchase price.