Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the excess amount paid by the sugar factory over and above the statutory minimum price fixed by the Central Government as State Advised Price could be treated as part of the purchase price of sugarcane and included in the dealer's turnover for purchase tax purposes.
Analysis: The excess payment was made only on the advice of the State Government and not under any proved agreement between the purchaser and the growers. The governing principle applied was that, where the statutory price is fixed and there is no contractual basis for a higher price, an amount paid in excess of the fixed price cannot automatically be treated as part of the sale price or turnover. The facts were treated as identical to the earlier binding principle that amounts paid merely as advance or under governmental advice, without statutory or contractual compulsion creating a higher purchase price, do not enter the taxable turnover. The decision relied on the distinction between payments forming part of the sale consideration and payments made outside the sale contract.
Conclusion: The State Advised Price could not be included in the assessee's turnover, and the revision petitions failed.