Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2004 (10) TMI 75 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Court dismisses review applications due to delay but orders Department to pay withheld interest with accrued interest. Emphasis on commitment to pay interest. Vendors entitled to interest despite Department's failure. The court dismissed the review applications due to delay but directed the Department to pay withheld interest amounts with accrued interest by a specified ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Court dismisses review applications due to delay but orders Department to pay withheld interest with accrued interest. Emphasis on commitment to pay interest. Vendors entitled to interest despite Department's failure.

                          The court dismissed the review applications due to delay but directed the Department to pay withheld interest amounts with accrued interest by a specified date. The court emphasized the Appropriate Authority's commitment to pay interest on the consideration amount and clarified the interpretation of relevant statutory provisions. Despite the Department's failure to take possession of the property, the court held that vendors were entitled to interest. Exemplary costs were not awarded as the withheld interest was invested and would be paid with accrued interest.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Delay in filing review applications.
                          2. Maintainability of review applications based on a consent order.
                          3. Entitlement to interest on the consideration amount deposited by the Appropriate Authority.
                          4. Interpretation of Section 269UG of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
                          5. Consequences of the Department not taking possession of the property.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Delay in Filing Review Applications:
                          The Appropriate Authority filed the review applications with a delay of 56 days. The Authority argued that the delay was due to the time required to follow due procedure for releasing the principal amount and analyzing the legal provisions. Although the explanation was not detailed, the court took a liberal view and entertained the review applications.

                          2. Maintainability of Review Applications Based on a Consent Order:
                          The opponents contended that the review applications were not maintainable as the order was passed based on consensus among the parties. The court noted that the Appropriate Authority had previously agreed to pay the interest accrued on the fixed deposit along with the principal amount. The court found substance in the opponents' argument that the Appropriate Authority's current stance was inconsistent with its earlier affidavit and submissions.

                          3. Entitlement to Interest on the Consideration Amount Deposited by the Appropriate Authority:
                          The Appropriate Authority argued that it was not liable to pay interest on the consideration amounts of Rs. 115 lakhs and Rs. 125 lakhs to the vendors and purchasers. The court rejected this argument, noting that the Appropriate Authority had previously committed to paying the interest accrued on the fixed deposit. The court emphasized that the stand taken by the Appropriate Authority in the affidavit was consistent with the statutory provisions of Section 269UG(4).

                          4. Interpretation of Section 269UG of the Income-tax Act, 1961:
                          The Appropriate Authority contended that Section 269UG(4) conferred discretion on whether to invest the consideration amount and pay interest. The court clarified that the provisions did not prohibit the payment of interest on the consideration amount. The court held that the Appropriate Authority's commitment to pay interest was in line with the statutory provisions and the submissions made during the hearing of the petitions.

                          5. Consequences of the Department Not Taking Possession of the Property:
                          The Department argued that it did not take possession of the property due to the pendency of the petitions. The court noted that the vendors had repeatedly called upon the Department to take possession. The court held that the Department's failure to take possession did not justify withholding interest on the consideration amount. The court cited a previous decision (Hotel Mardias Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India) to support its view that vendors cannot be deprived of their right to get possession even if the Department does not take possession.

                          Conclusion:
                          The court dismissed the review applications, directing the Department to pay the withheld interest amounts along with accrued interest by December 15, 2004. The court declined to award exemplary costs to the opponents, noting that the withheld interest had been invested in fixed deposits and would be paid along with accrued interest.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found