Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, after the 1996 amendment to section 4, the cost of transportation of excisable goods from the factory to the depot from which they are cleared forms part of the assessable value.
Analysis: The appeal was taken up on merits because remand for compliance with the pre-deposit direction would have been pointless. The question was the same valuation issue already decided between the parties in a connected matter, and the earlier ruling was treated as governing the present appeal.
Conclusion: The cost of transportation from the factory to the depot was held to be includible in the assessable value. The appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Following the post-1996 amendment to section 4, transportation cost incurred for moving excisable goods from the factory to the depot from which clearance is effected is includible in assessable value.