Finality of appellate orders bars later enhancement of redemption fine and penalty where the quantum is already settled.

A redemption fine finally determined in an earlier appellate order cannot be reopened for enhancement in a later revenue appeal. The Tribunal had already reduced the fine to 75% of CIF value in the respondents' earlier appeal, so the revenue's request for further enhancement was rejected. The penalty was also left unchanged because it had already been fixed at 10% of CIF value and was described as consistent with the Tribunal's approach in similar cases. In the absence of any basis for a higher levy, further enhancement of penalty was not justified, and the revenue appeal failed entirely.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether the redemption fine could be enhanced in the revenue appeal after the Tribunal had already reduced it in the respondents' earlier appeal; and (ii) whether the penalty warranted further enhancement.

Issue (i): whether the redemption fine could be enhanced in the revenue appeal after the Tribunal had already reduced it in the respondents' earlier appeal.

Analysis: The redemption fine had already been directly assailed by the respondents and was finally dealt with by the Tribunal in the earlier round, where it was reduced to 75% of the CIF value. Once that issue stood finally determined, no further enhancement could be granted in the revenue appeal.

Conclusion: The request to enhance the redemption fine was rejected.

Issue (ii): whether the penalty warranted further enhancement.

Analysis: The penalty was already fixed at 10% of the CIF value, which was stated to be consistent with the Tribunal's approach in similar matters. In the absence of any basis for a higher levy, further enhancement was not justified.

Conclusion: No further enhancement of penalty was allowed.

Final Conclusion: The revenue appeal failed in its entirety, and the adjudged redemption fine and penalty were left undisturbed.

Ratio Decidendi: A matter finally decided in an earlier appellate order cannot be reopened for enhancement in a subsequent appeal, and penalty cannot be increased where the imposed quantum is already in line with the settled approach in comparable cases.

---