Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the benefit of exemption and refund under Notification No. 70/81-Cus. dated 26-3-1981 could be denied merely because the not manufactured in India certificate was applied for or produced after arrival or clearance of the goods.
Analysis: The notification did not prescribe any fixed time by which the not manufactured in India certificate had to be applied for. It required production of the certificate at the time of clearance of the goods or within such period as the proper officer may allow. The certificate produced after clearance could not, by itself, disentitle the importer from the exemption benefit. The only further question was whether the certificate in fact covered the goods in dispute.
Conclusion: The objection based only on belated production of the certificate was rejected. The matter was sent back for verification of whether the certificate covered the goods, and refund was to follow if that requirement was satisfied.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded to the extent that the denial of exemption on the ground of timing alone was set aside, and the claim was left for fresh examination on the factual coverage of the certificate.