2002 (5) TMI 554 - AT - Central Excise

Commissioner's Excess Authority in Capacity Determination Review Declared Void. Appeals Allowed with Consequential Relief.

GOVIND MILLS LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., ALLAHABAD

The Tribunal held that the Commissioner exceeded his authority by reviewing the capacity determination order after finalization, as he lacked the power of ... Order - Finality of - Review Issues:Capacity determination under Induction Furnace Annual Capacity Determination Rules, 1997; Validity of penalties imposed; Review of capacity determination order by Commissioner; Power of review under Central Excise Act; Appealability of capacity determination order.Capacity Determination under Induction Furnace Annual Capacity Determination Rules, 1997:The appellants, manufacturers of non-alloy steel ingots, had their induction furnace capacity determined provisionally and finally. Subsequent investigations revealed discrepancies in the capacity determination process, leading to the imposition of penalties and demands. The Commissioner reopened the final determination based on new evidence, resulting in the imposition of penalties and demands.Validity of Penalties Imposed:The Commissioner confirmed the demand and imposed penalties under Section 11AC, along with personal penalties on specific individuals. The appellants argued against the penalties, highlighting deficiencies in the order and questioning the reliance on a retracted statement without cross-examination. The main legal argument focused on the Commissioner's authority to review the capacity determination order after finalization.Review of Capacity Determination Order by Commissioner:The appellants contended that the Commissioner, having finally determined the capacity of the induction furnaces, exceeded his authority by reviewing the order without the power of review vested in him. Citing legal precedent, the appellants argued that the Commissioner became functus officio after the final order and, therefore, the show cause notice and subsequent order were invalid and illegal.Power of Review under Central Excise Act:The absence of a provision for review of one's own orders under the Central Excise Act was a crucial point of contention. The Commissioner's actions in reviewing the capacity determination order were deemed void and non est due to lacking the authority to do so post final determination. The Tribunal emphasized that only an appeal could be filed against the final determination order.Appealability of Capacity Determination Order:The Tribunal clarified that the order finally determining the capacity of the induction furnaces was appealable, but no provision for self-review existed under the Central Excise Act. As a result, the order passed by the Commissioner was declared void, and the appeals were allowed, with consequential relief to be granted as per the law. Cross-objections filed by the Department were also disposed of in the judgment.