Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit on the disputed goods was admissible as capital goods and whether the matter required re-examination by the adjudicating authority.
Analysis: The disputed items were stated to require reconsideration in the light of the Larger Bench decision on the scope of capital goods for Modvat credit. The impugned order, to the extent challenged, was therefore set aside and the issue was sent back for fresh consideration.
Outcome: The appeal was allowed by way of remand for re-examination of the Modvat credit claim.