Unsecured creditor withdrawal from sale proceeds allowed with safeguards for later claims and possible restoration

An unsecured creditor was permitted to withdraw deposited sale proceeds towards its admitted claim, but only on filing an affidavit and indemnity bond ensuring that the amount would remain subject to any later claims by unsecured creditors or employees lodged within one year. If such claims were subsequently found payable and the remaining sale proceeds were insufficient, the creditor would have to restore the amount wholly or partly. The Sales Committee was discharged for the time being because the remaining properties had not been fully sold, with liberty to recall it if further claims arose and unsold assets had to be liquidated. The applications were disposed of on that basis, while preserving the ability to address future admissible claims from remaining assets.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether the unsecured creditor could be permitted to withdraw the amount deposited in Court from the sale proceeds, subject to safeguards for any future claims; (ii) whether the Sales Committee could be discharged in the present circumstances.

Issue (i): whether the unsecured creditor could be permitted to withdraw the amount deposited in Court from the sale proceeds, subject to safeguards for any future claims.

Analysis: The deposited amount, together with interest, was directed to be used for payment of the unsecured creditor's admitted claim. Withdrawal was made conditional on filing an affidavit and indemnity bond undertaking that the amount would remain subject to any future claims of unsecured creditors and employees lodged within one year, and that the amount would be restored, wholly or partly, if such claims were later found payable and the balance sale proceeds were insufficient.

Conclusion: The unsecured creditor was permitted to withdraw the amount, subject to the stated affidavit, indemnity bond, and future-claims conditions.

Issue (ii): whether the Sales Committee could be discharged in the present circumstances.

Analysis: Since the remaining properties had not yet been fully sold and the possibility of further claims was kept open, the Sales Committee was considered capable of being discharged for the time being, with liberty to call it back if additional claims were received or accepted and the unsold assets had to be liquidated to satisfy them.

Conclusion: The Sales Committee was discharged, subject to being recalled if necessary for sale of the remaining assets.

Final Conclusion: The applications were finally disposed of by directing payment to the unsecured creditor from the deposited sale proceeds, while preserving the Court's ability to address any later admissible claims from the remaining assets.

---