Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the scheme of amalgamation between the companies was liable to be sanctioned under the Companies Act, 1956.
Analysis: The shareholders of the concerned companies had approved the amalgamation scheme in accordance with the directions issued for convening and conducting the meetings. The Official Liquidator's report, filed in compliance with the second proviso to section 394, disclosed no material showing that the affairs of the company had been conducted in a manner prejudicial to the interests of its members or the public interest. The Regional Director did not oppose the scheme, and the Court found compliance with the requirements of sections 391 and 394.
Conclusion: The scheme of amalgamation was sanctioned and both company petitions were allowed.