Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>CEGAT New Delhi allows appeal, sets aside duty demand. Classification list approved, demand unsustainable per Cotspun case. Refund subject to unjust enrichment law.</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi allowed the appeal by M/s. Consolidated Pneumatic Tools Co. (I) Ltd., setting aside the duty demand from July 1990 ... Demand - Limitation The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi allowed the appeal by M/s. Consolidated Pneumatic Tools Co. (I) Ltd. regarding duty demand from July 1990 to Dec 1990. The classification list was approved, and the demand was found not sustainable. The appeal was allowed based on the Supreme Court's decision in the case of Cotspun, setting aside the order-in-appeal. Refund, if any, will be governed by the law of unjust enrichment as per Mafatlal Industries case.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
