Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the ultrasonic washing machine used for cleaning and demagnetising ball bearings was correctly classifiable under sub-heading 8479.81 or under the residuary sub-heading 8479.89 of the Customs Tariff Act.
Analysis: The machine was found to perform cleaning and demagnetising functions through ultrasonic waves, jet washing and related processes. The decision turned on whether these functions amounted to an article used for treating metal, as claimed by the importer, or whether the equipment was only a specialised cleaning machine not covered by the specific heading. On the technical description, the machine's essential function was removal of foreign particles and demagnetisation of bearings, which did not fit the description of goods for treating metal under the specific heading.
Conclusion: The machine was held classifiable under the residuary sub-heading 8479.89 and not under sub-heading 8479.81, in favour of Revenue.
Final Conclusion: The classification adopted by the appellate authority was set aside and the disputed goods were placed in the residuary tariff entry.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a product does not answer the description of a specific tariff entry, its classification falls to be determined under the residuary entry corresponding to its primary function.