Input credit on yarn waste cleared when documentary evidence satisfies the prescribed legal requirements

Yarn waste arising during ring-frame, cone-winding, reeling, warping, sizing and pirn winding was examined for duty liability, alongside the assessee's entitlement to input credit. The lower authority treated the waste as a new product and considered duty unavoidable, but also noted that credit would be available if legal conditions were met. The appellate analysis identified inconsistency in that approach and resolved it in favour of allowing credit on production of documentary evidence, subject to proof of compliance with the prescribed requirements.

---

---

Issues: Whether yarn waste arising during the process of yarn at ring frame, cone-winding, reeling, warping, sizing and pirn winding was liable to duty, and whether the assessee was entitled to credit on the duty paid on inputs.

Analysis: The lower authority had held that a new product had emerged and that duty on yarn waste could not be avoided, while also recording that credit would be available on fulfilment of the legal requirements. The appellate finding rejecting the appeal was inconsistent with this earlier conclusion on credit eligibility. The appeal was therefore taken up finally and the inconsistency was resolved in favour of granting credit on production of documentary evidence.

Conclusion: The assessee was held entitled to credit on production of documentary evidence, and the appeal succeeded.

---