Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the effective date of the reduced capacity of the induction furnace should be the date of receipt of the assessee's intimation, the date on which the assessee actually changed the crucible, or the later date fixed by the Commissioner.
Analysis: The goods were covered by the annual capacity determination regime under Section 3A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and Notification No. 30/97-C.E. (N.T.) dated 01.08.1997, with the change governed by Rule 4 of the Induction Furnace Annual Capacity Determination Rules, 1997. The assessee had intimated the proposed change and later informed the authorities that the change had been effected. The communication was received in the Commissioner's office on 02.01.1998. Since the change in capacity was required to be intimated to the Commissioner, the date of receipt of that intimation was treated as the operative date for applying the changed capacity.
Conclusion: The effective date of the reduced capacity was held to be 02.01.1998, not 18.03.1998 and not 08.12.1997.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded only to the extent that the changed capacity was directed to operate from 02.01.1998, with consequential relief according to law.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statutory scheme requires intimation of a change in furnace capacity, the date of receipt of that intimation by the competent authority is the relevant date for giving effect to the changed capacity.