TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Complaint for unpaid dividend dismissed due to failure to apply for refund.</h1> <h3>Registrar of Companies Versus C. Pullaikah Setty</h3> The complaint for payment of dividend was filed, but as the complainant failed to apply for refund as required, the order was set aside and remanded for ... Consumer - Definition of - Complainant, a shareholder in TIL, complained about non-receipt of dividend as complainant had not received dividend amounts due to change of address for over three years and said amounts were sent to Registrar of Companies under section 205A of Companies Act after lapse of three years - Opposite parties opposed said complaint on ground that complainant had not applied to TIL in accordance with provisions of section 205B and in Form II of rules made thereunder, and that remedy lay under Companies Act - Whether District Forum having not considered these objections before ordering refund, its order was liable to be set aside and matter remanded back for fresh consideration - Held, yes The complaint was filed for payment of dividend. The complainant did not apply for refund as required, so the order was set aside and remanded for further consideration. District Forum to decide the matter afresh.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
