https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102358 A consumer complaint concerning refund of unpaid dividend transferred to the Registrar of Companies was remanded because the District Forum directed refund without examining the statutory procedure under rule 6, including the requirement of an application in Form No. II. The Commission noted that the objections on compliance with the prescribed refund mechanism and the Forum's jurisdiction had not been considered. The District Forum's order was therefore set aside and the matter sent back for fresh consideration after notice to the parties and decision on the objections in accordance with law. en-us Mon, 19 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102358 A consumer complaint concerning refund of unpaid dividend transferred to the Registrar of Companies was remanded because the District Forum directed refund without examining the statutory procedure under rule 6, including the requirement of an application in Form No. II. The Commission noted that the objections on compliance with the prescribed refund mechanism and the Forum's jurisdiction had not been considered. The District Forum's order was therefore set aside and the matter sent back for fresh consideration after notice to the parties and decision on the objections in accordance with law. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 19 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102358