TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appellate Tribunal rejects penalty, stays recovery.</h1> <h3>VIPIN ENTERPRISES Versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, KANDLA</h3> The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai found the penalty imposed by the Commissioner as a substitute for fine in lieu of confiscation unacceptable in law. ... Penalty not a substitute of redemption fine The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai found the penalty imposed by the Commissioner as a substitute for fine in lieu of confiscation unacceptable in law. The Tribunal waived the deposit of the penalty and stayed its recovery. The legal basis for the penalty as a substitute for fine in lieu of confiscation was not supported.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
