Classification of motor car condensers and evaporators remanded for fresh factual determination after inadequate record on product distinction.

Classification of condensers and evaporators for motor cars depended on whether they were merely parts of an auto air-conditioning kit or distinct goods requiring separate examination. The record did not adequately establish the factual basis for distinguishing the impugned goods from similar items already cleared under the approved heading, so the classification could not be sustained on the existing material. The classification order was set aside and the matter was remanded for de novo adjudication after granting the assessee an opportunity of hearing, leaving the dispute open for fresh decision on facts and law.

---

---

Issues: Whether the impugned goods, namely condensers and evaporators for motor cars, were correctly classifiable under Heading 8415.00 as parts of air-conditioners or under Heading 8419.00, and whether the matter required remand for fresh determination.

Analysis: The dispute turned on whether the goods cleared under the relevant classification list were merely parts of an auto air-conditioning kit or distinct items whose classification had to be examined independently. The record did not contain adequate grounds for distinguishing the impugned condensers and evaporators from similar goods already being cleared under the approved heading. In the absence of a proper factual determination on the nature of the goods actually cleared, a fresh adjudication was necessary.

Conclusion: The classification order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the original authority for de novo adjudication after granting an opportunity of hearing.

Final Conclusion: The assessee obtained relief to the extent of remand, and the classification dispute was left open for fresh decision on facts and law.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the factual basis for classification is not adequately established, and the record does not justify the distinction drawn by the lower authority, the proper course is to set aside the classification and direct de novo adjudication after hearing the assessee.

---