Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Companies Law

        1990 (9) TMI 266 - HC - Companies Law

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Court dismisses winding-up petitions against Jayant Vitamins Ltd due to substantial counterclaims and ongoing criminal proceedings. The court dismissed the winding-up petitions against Jayant Vitamins Ltd. The court found the company's counterclaims of fraud and illegal profits ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Court dismisses winding-up petitions against Jayant Vitamins Ltd due to substantial counterclaims and ongoing criminal proceedings.

                          The court dismissed the winding-up petitions against Jayant Vitamins Ltd. The court found the company's counterclaims of fraud and illegal profits substantial, supported by detailed accounts and ongoing criminal proceedings. Considering the company's financial stability and opposition from its workers, the court deemed it unjust to order winding up. The disputes required detailed examination in civil court, leading to the dismissal of the petitions. Parties were advised to pursue their claims in civil court.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Non-payment of debts by Jayant Vitamins Ltd.
                          2. Allegations of fraud and illegal profits by petitioners in collusion with a former vice-president.
                          3. Financial stability of Jayant Vitamins Ltd.
                          4. Interests of the company's workers and employees.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Non-payment of Debts by Jayant Vitamins Ltd.:
                          The petitioners, various firms and individuals, filed petitions for the winding up of Jayant Vitamins Ltd. under sections 433 and 439 of the Companies Act, citing non-payment of debts. The petitioners supplied goods and services to the company, and despite statutory notices, the company failed to pay the outstanding amounts. The petitioners argued that the company was unable to meet its financial obligations, indicating insolvency.

                          2. Allegations of Fraud and Illegal Profits:
                          Jayant Vitamins Ltd. countered the petitions by alleging that the petitioners, in collusion with the former vice-president R.P. Sinha, engaged in fraudulent activities, resulting in illegal profits. The company claimed that Sinha misused his position to benefit his associates, including the petitioners, leading to overbilling and inflated rates. The company initiated criminal proceedings against Sinha and demanded the return of the alleged illegal gains from the petitioners.

                          3. Financial Stability of Jayant Vitamins Ltd.:
                          The company argued that it was financially stable, with a turnover of Rs. 36.50 crores and a net profit of Rs. 2.68 crores for the year ending June 30, 1989. The company highlighted its ongoing modernization and expansion programs, supported by financial institutions and sanctioned by the Government of India. The company claimed that its share price had increased, and it was regularly paying other creditors, indicating a sound financial position.

                          4. Interests of the Company's Workers and Employees:
                          The workers' union and employees' association of Jayant Vitamins Ltd. intervened, opposing the winding-up petitions. They argued that the company employed about 700 people and was financially stable. They supported the company's claim that the petitions were motivated by the petitioners' collusion with Sinha to harm the company.

                          Judgment:
                          The court examined the documents and arguments presented by both parties. It noted that the petitioners had to establish that the debt was clear, valid, and undisputed. However, the court found that the company's counterclaims of fraud and illegal profits were substantial and bona fide, supported by detailed accounts and ongoing criminal proceedings against Sinha. The court also considered the company's financial stability and the interests of its workers, who opposed the winding-up petitions.

                          The court concluded that the disputes raised by the company were not frivolous or baseless and required detailed examination by a competent civil court. Given the company's financial stability and the opposition from its workers, the court deemed it unjust and inequitable to order the winding up of Jayant Vitamins Ltd. Consequently, the petitions for winding up were dismissed, with the parties advised to pursue their claims in civil court.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found