Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the official liquidator and the Central Government were entitled to a prescribed fee from the sale proceeds when the secured property was sold by the court through the District Judge and not realised by the official liquidator.
Analysis: Section 451 of the Companies Act and rule 291 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 apply only where the official liquidator acts as liquidator and realises property so as to attract the prescribed fee payable to the Central Government. Here, the property was auctioned by the court, the auction expenses were separately met, and the official liquidator did not undertake the realisation of the secured assets for the applicant-bank. The statutory basis for claiming a fee from the applicant's share of the sale proceeds was therefore absent.
Conclusion: The objection of the official liquidator failed, and the applicant was entitled to receive the sale proceeds lying with the court.