TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeal dismissed for failure to consider crucial facts in tax appeal; adherence to Form No. 10 details required.</h1> <h3>Director of Income Tax (Exemption) Versus Guru Nanak Vidhya Bhandar Trust.</h3> The appeal was dismissed by the Tribunal due to the failure of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) to consider crucial factual aspects. The Tribunal ... Benefits u/s 11 - Under rule 17, a person is required to file Form No. 10 giving specific details for accumulation. Revenue contends that mere listing of the manifold objects of the trusts would not suffice. Each purpose of accumulation and the amount set apart therefor must be specified before the benefit u/s 11 could be claimed – Assessee’s request for accumulation has been accepted in the preceding and succeeding assessment years and this is the solitary year in which the claims came to be rejected. Further, the objects for accumulation set out in Form No. 10 in the preceding assessment years, in the succeeding assessment years and in the year under appeal were absolutely identical - Thus, in order to maintain consistency, in our view, we are not required to entertain this revenue’s appeal and accordingly the same is dismissed Issues:Claiming benefits under section 11 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 based on accumulation details provided in Form No. 10.Analysis:The judgment revolves around the issue of claiming benefits under section 11 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 by providing specific accumulation details in Form No. 10. The learned counsel for the appellant argues that simply listing the manifold objects of the trusts is insufficient. It is contended that each purpose of accumulation and the corresponding amount must be clearly specified to claim the benefits under section 11. However, the Tribunal in this case emphasized certain factual aspects to support its decision. These aspects included the history of allowing benefits under section 11 in previous assessment years, consistent aims and objects of the trust, utilization of accumulated funds for charitable purposes, and acceptance as an educational and charitable trust in subsequent years. The Tribunal highlighted that the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) did not give due consideration to these crucial factual aspects, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.In paragraph 31 of the judgment, it is noted that the assessee-trust had a long-standing history dating back to 1924, enjoying exemption under the relevant provisions of the Income-tax Act for charitable trusts. The request for accumulation had been accepted in both preceding and succeeding assessment years, with identical objects for accumulation specified in Form No. 10 across different assessment years. The Tribunal, in order to maintain consistency and fairness, decided to dismiss the appeal based on the factual aspects presented and the historical acceptance of accumulation requests in previous and subsequent assessment years. This decision underscores the importance of factual consistency and adherence to specified accumulation details in claiming benefits under section 11 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.Overall, the judgment provides a comprehensive analysis of the issue at hand, emphasizing the significance of consistent factual aspects and adherence to accumulation details in Form No. 10 for claiming benefits under section 11 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The decision highlights the importance of historical acceptance of accumulation requests and the need for proper consideration of factual aspects by the authorities involved in such cases.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
